Category
5 articles
UK firms routinely commission specialist advice against the most visible complaint — a thin pipeline, a slow board, a restless team — and are then surprised when the improvement does not endure. The problem usually sits in the operating system beneath the symptom, and the brief is where the mistake is made.
The most expensive advisory relationship is not the one with the highest day rate — it is the one that works only because a single brilliant individual is in the room. As procurement cycles open for 2026, buyers should be asking a blunter question: will this still work when the consultant leaves?
Coming second in a competitive tender is often treated as an administrative disappointment and filed away. For an ambitious UK firm, however, a narrow loss can be a richer source of commercial insight than a comfortable win. The value depends on how deliberately the firm interrogates the result.
Cost scrutiny and a great deal of artificial intelligence noise have pushed specialist advice back under the microscope. The answer is not fewer advisers for their own sake, but a better brief, clearly assigned decision rights and a measure of what stays behind when the engagement ends.
A recognisable consultancy logo can feel like insurance in a difficult board decision. Too often, however, UK firms are buying reassurance rather than expertise — and paying for it in fees and slower, diluted decision-making. This piece sets out a more disciplined way to commission specialist advice.